~
"How often do you meet the Buddha on the road? Daily? How often do you kill him?”
Buddha is illusion, belief that he’s, ‘on the side of the road and ‘you’ can kill him,’ is delusion.
"To become aware is not to be superficially conscious,”…
Sure it is. Awareness = Consciousness, or conscious, thus, to be superficially conscious one is aware. If J were around (I’m under the impression he’s taking a dirt nap,) I’d ask him what ‘superficially conscious’ means to him. Perhaps what he’s getting at is, ‘superficially attentive.’ If one is conscious one is conscious, if one is not, they are not.
“…but to go into the full depth of consciousness so as not to leave undiscovered one unconscious reaction.” Sounds delightful, sign me up!
“All this demands thought;” Critical thinking is a Part of this, true….
“…all this demands an alterness of mind and heart,”
Alterness? Change? Alterness mind or thinking and see what occurs. Alter ‘heart’ and you’ll be taking a dirt nap along with J.
Also, the stupendous J takes a big leap with the comments above in regards to ‘thinking’ and then move right to ‘mind.’ Mind is all inclusive, thinking is a part of mind. J, based on his moving straight from one to the other terms appears to ‘think’ they are one and the same. Not true.
“…not a mind that is cluttered up with beliefs, creeds, and ideals.” To be clear, a (thinking) mind that (may) be cluttered up with beliefs, creeds and ideals. ‘Thought’ or thinking IS belief, creed and ideals.
“Most minds are burdened with these and with the desire to follow.” Ok, so (thinking) minds are burdened with these and with the desire to follow. Desire is…..? Emotion, as humans are emotional beings. Follow? Follow what? Mind? Thought? Follow to…where?
“As you become conscious…” Repetitive, redundant. Since you are you and are reading this or listening/watching J spew forth his opinions and beliefs, ‘you’ are ‘conscious.’ Once again, it seems J may be looking for the term attention or attentive. ‘As you become attentive…’
“of your burden,…” Great. …and now I’ve got a fucking burden. If you say so, kimosabe. ‘Burden’ is subjective (as it all is) and judgemental. Perhaps the word ‘opportunity’ would make for a better choice of word.
“don't say…” Why not? Are you the only one free to spew forth your belief stricken drivel?
“…you mustn't have ideals, you mustn't have creeds, and repeat all the rest of the jargon.” Avoiding the main gist of the lecture. All jargon is an attentive opportunity to truly understand said jargon.
“The very "must" creates another doctrine, another creed;…” Duality at its finest. At least he got this right, yet unsure if he understood what he wrote.
“…merely become conscious…” See above comments in regards to repetitive, redundant and word choice.
:”…and in the intensity of that consciousness, in the intensity of awareness,…” Intense consciousness/awareness. This implies there’s un-intense or not intense consciousness/awareness? Perhaps just yet another incorrect choice of words.
“…in that flame you will create such crisis, such conflict, that that very conflict itself will dissolve the hindrance." Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I get it!
A cozy, stylish, new age quote, using a lot of words to say, “Get real.” Or, define ‘what’s real’ or ‘who am I’ or ‘what is me?’ or ‘no belief is true.’
- J. Krishnamurti
“Nothing in addition is required, you are already fully equipped.” Sure there is. Can you see it? Action.
“Self Inquiry, Recapitulation, Spiritual Autolysis, all only methods by which to make aware that which is unnoticed, unresolved, unaddressed.” Make aware and put to action…
“Where does the pursuit to identifying what serves you vs. what does not serve you lead?”
Lead? Down a path? “All paths are one in a million paths and lead no-where.” Paths are for those concerned with paths, not untangling self.
“Rather opening to awareness…” Is it possible to not open to awareness? As one IS awareness, how can one not open to it? This may read, ‘Open to thought, belief, faith, self…what does this show you?’
“…that brings it all to light,…” It does? Perhaps it brings it all to dark? Dark = absence of light. Why not?
“…accepting it all,…” Who is accepting? What does accept mean? What ‘it’ is being accepted? ‘All’ what? What to do with ‘it’ once ‘all’ is accepted? Where am I going to put it? I’m going to put ‘it’ in my pockets, because they are empty now…
“…what serves, what does not, fully embracing the totality.” Totality? Totality of Self? Yippie! Please tell me what that means to you. What’s Self?
“The mere process of acceptance negates a need to choose one over another,…” It does? You’ve a ‘whole lotta love’ going on here in this sentence. ‘The mere process.’ What’s mere about it? What process? Oh, wait, ‘process of acceptance.’ Please detail this out for me, I’m kinda dumb. Also, please ‘splain this to me: If one is in acceptance, how does one negate? Doesn’t negate, err, negate acceptance?
“A need to choose…” Who is choosing what? Choice. Hmmm…this seems to dip into the realm of, well, choice, free will, predilection and destiny. If ‘you’ change the way ‘you’ look at ‘things,’ the things you look at change.
“…and as the need falls away,…” Mine fell right into a gorge. I’ve got the winch, would you mind hooking up to my needs so I can retrieve them?
Thank you Aff for yet another enlightened post.
Affinity wrote:How often do you meet the Buddha on the road? Daily? How often do you kill him?
"To become aware is not to be superficially conscious, but to go into the full depth of consciousness so as not to leave undiscovered one unconscious reaction. All this demands thought; all this demands an alterness of mind and heart, not a mind that is cluttered up with beliefs, creeds, and ideals. Most minds are burdened with these and with the desire to follow. As you become conscious of your burden, don't say you mustn't have ideals, you mustn't have creeds, and repeat all the rest of the jargon. The very "must" creates another doctrine, another creed; merely become conscious and in the intensity of that consciousness, in the intensity of awareness, in that flame you will create such crisis, such conflict, that that very conflict itself will dissolve the hindrance." - J. Krishnamurti
Nothing in addition is required, you are already fully equipped. Self Inquiry, Recapitulation, Spiritual Autolysis, all only methods by which to make aware that which is unnoticed, unresolved, unaddressed. Where does the pursuit to identifying what serves you vs. what does not serve you lead? Rather opening to awareness that brings it all to light, accepting it all, what serves, what does not, fully embracing the totality. The mere process of acceptance negates a need to choose one over another, and as the need falls away, an ease to do or not do anything is unobscured.
“Purified and naked, free and unbound, hair disheveled, ears alert.” - Yuanwu